Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: sync solana branch with upstream #15

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024
Merged

feat: sync solana branch with upstream #15

merged 28 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

eloylp
Copy link
Member

@eloylp eloylp commented Apr 19, 2024

Syncs our solana branch implementation with the code from the upstream.

Reviewer recommendations:

Not expected to review the upstream code, as it comes from main. This PR just creates some awareness of the touched files.

cjcobb23 and others added 27 commits April 2, 2024 10:15
…es (axelarnetwork#327)

* feat(minor-multisig-prover)!: idempotent resigning of workerset updates

* allow update workerset to be called multiple times for the same
  workerset update
* reuse the same created_at nonce when resigning
…rk#325)

* feat: add CONTRACTS_PER_CHAIN map and execution message

* test: add test_instantiation to monitoring

* fix: remove redundant error types, address clippy lint issues

* refactor: change scope to only include prover, add tests

* fix: rollback changes made to rewards contract

* fix: cargo formatting for rewards contract

* refactor: address PR open conversations

* refactor: add more description to Unauthorized and NoProversRegisteredForChain errors
…nt in the curve (axelarnetwork#331)

* add unit tests

* sort dependencies

* fixed typos

* review

* remove unused import

* fixed comments
…axelarnetwork#334)

* feat: add CHAINS_PER_WORKER map to service registry

* refactor: optimize CHAINS_PER_WORKER update, address PR conversations

* refactor: remove extra service registry message, add unit test to state, refactor saving to maps

* refactor: use update instead of may_load and save

* fix: remove unused import from service registry state.rs

* test: add three more unit tests to service registry, refactor variable names
)

* feat: add and finish CF r2 workflow file

* chore: remove paths from on_push settings of r2 yaml file

* refactor: workflow file cleanup for PR review

* refactor: add /contracts to r2 destination folder

* refactor: add empty line to the end of workflow file
…network#340)

* moved couple of tests to unit tests

* moved more tests to contract unit tests

* move test to integration-tests module

* move test to integration tests module and remove unused files

* added comment
)

add paginated chains query to connection router, monitor contract can use the api to return paginated chains with status
…e-verifier contract (axelarnetwork#338)

* refactor(client): add the client package and migrate for the aggregate-verifier contract

* delete weird file

* implement From trait for client

* fix clippy
…ld (axelarnetwork#336)

* feat(minor-multisig-prover)!: allow dynamic update of signing threshold
* implement trait for evm message id
Governance can jail workers. A jailed worker cannot unbond or claim stake.
…elarnetwork#350)

* fix(minor-nexus-gateway)!: make msg id consistent with evm chains
…rk#353)

* remove response data from voting-verifier verify messages

* remove duplicated test

* remove unused response data
…ent instantiation msg parameters (axelarnetwork#355)

* feat(multisig-prover): allow governance to update workerset and document instantiation msg parameters
@eloylp eloylp changed the base branch from main to solana April 19, 2024 22:07
@eloylp eloylp requested a review from roberts-pumpurs April 19, 2024 22:09
@eloylp eloylp changed the title Sync solana branch with upstream feat: sync solana branch with upstream Apr 19, 2024
@eloylp eloylp force-pushed the solana-sync-1904 branch from 06fa588 to e56482a Compare April 19, 2024 23:06
@eloylp eloylp merged commit 6917228 into solana Apr 26, 2024
1 of 5 checks passed
@eloylp eloylp deleted the solana-sync-1904 branch April 26, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants